We all know now that bushtits are one of the most social species of birds. They like to do everything in groups whether it is to forage for food or to conserve their energy at night by ‘huddling’ to abnormally cold conditions (Chaplin, 1982). Not only that but bushtits usually have helpers at nests, this is called cooperative breeding. Helpers are individuals that help raise offspring that are not their own (Sloane, 1996). There have been plenty of research on these topics that I would like to explore for you today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2e64/a2e6400189a4ace7a1be1bb24448589b876f02bf" alt=""
Group of Bushtit huddling together. [Link]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c979d/c979d8ddaf050c34e5c72b843a95ebff6d79d5c0" alt=""
This table shows that single bushtits uses up more energy than paired (Chaplin, 1982). [Link]
Since bushtits are always around other birds, are they polygamous or monogamous? Well, with the development of DNA probes that detect high levels of genetic variation (Bruce et al, 1996) we can see if offspring have any genetic contributions from a second male. Bushtits are cooperative breeders, they usually have another bird other than the original pair at the nest to help care for the offspring, called helpers (Sloane, 1996). The helper is usually an unmated male or female who have failed in finding a mate and reproducing their own offspring. Sometimes the helper can get lucky and find an opportunity for genetic contributions through extrapair fertilizations or intraspecific brood parasitism (Bruce et al, 1996). Extrapair fertilization is when the helper (usually male) copulates with the female and passes his genes onto some of her eggs. And Intraspecific brood parasitism is when females lay her eggs into the nest of another pair of bushtits. Is this true? Does the helper get a chance to reproduce? Well helpers usually join either before or during egg laying and some were observed doing courtship behaviours such as fluttering chases and vocalization around the nest (Sloane, 1996).
According to this DNA probe results showed that the bushtits were sexually monogamous and so extrapair fertilization probably did not occur (Sloane, 1996). The DNA probe showed banding patterns of offspring and compared with those of its parents. They were likely related if the banding size and intensities were similar (Bruce et al, 1996). Which was found to be the case. So, does the helper get any reproductive success or is it purely altruistic? (Ervin, 1977) found that in 16 pairings between bushtits, 11 of them switched mate from one season to the next. The mates were different from the previous season even though the former mates were still alive. Therefore, helpers do have a chance at reproducing with a female second brood while adopting her first offspring (Bruce et al, 1996).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08908/0890856a1bfc829dc88d5d428cf0bcf551292713" alt=""
The assigned father (male 2) is shown to be the dad whereas the helper (male 1) is excluded based on the novel bands and band-sharing coeffients (Bruce et al, 1996). [Link]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c664b/c664be0007a1bbae6054e165751e888260212a7f" alt=""
Bonus picture of a bushtit laying on its back! Don’t worry they’re okay. And you can see the band on its right leg! Photo by Paige Monteiro (thanks!!)
Literature Cited
Bruce JP, Quinn JS, Sloane SA, White BN. 1996. DNA Fingerprinting Reveals Monogamy in the Bushtit, a Cooperatively Breeding Species. The Auk. 113(2): 511-516. [Link]
Chaplin SB. 1982. The Energetic Significance of Huddling Behavior in Common Bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus). The Auk. 99(3): 424-430. [Link]
Ervin S. 1977. FLOCK SIZE, COMPOSITION, AND BEHAVIOR IN A POPULATION OF BUSHTITS (Psaltriparus Minimus). JSTOR. 48(2): 97-109. [Link]
Sloane SA. 1996. Incidence and Origins of Supernumeraries at Bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus) Nests. The Auk. 113(4): 757-770. [Link]
Smith SM. 1972. Roosting Aggregations of Bushtits in Response to Cold Temperatures. The Condor. 74(4): 478-479. [Link]
Very cool, are there any indications that the helpers actually have an advantage for mating in later years because the females recognize them? Or is it more so just considered a socially advantageous trait?
I think that it is an advantage because most helpers are ones that cannot get a mate so even if they have to wait til later for a female, they will have a better chance at reproduction! Hopefully that answers the question hahah.
It’s crazy how small they are – almost as small as hummingbirds! I can see how their tiny size would affect their basal metabolism rate and relative food consumption. Do you know if bushtits go into torpor to conserve energy or is staying in a flock their only mechanism?
They are so cute! haha. From what I’ve researched and found was that bushtits don’t go into torpor. They are always amongst a flock so they would usually just huddle to conserve energy! When they are nesting, the insulation of the nests will keep them warm too.